Tags
baking
constitution
cooking
freedom
gay
glenn beck
hate
levees
liar
libertarianism
liberty
machiavelli
maglev
maxims
military industrial complex
minarchist
movement
murder police state terror abuse death law suit
murray rothbard
neocon
new media
new orleans
new york
nutrition
obesity
overweight
paleoconservative
Patrick Henry
patriot
patriots
philosophy
propaganda
quotes
radio
rand paul
reagan
recipes
renewable energy
republic
responder
ron paul
spontaneous organization
state of being tax
stony road
tax protesters
tea party
technology
theocracy
the prince
Thomas Jefferson
thomas paine
transgender
truth
unprincipled
vampires
virtue
voluntaryism
war hawk
we are change
willpower

Chicago Bar-Tender : Jennifer Fernicola on 11.13.09 : The estate of a man allegedly held by his legs from the second floor window of his home by two Chicago police officers is suing the city and the individual police officers.
Thanks to Angela Keaton from 
Hate is a shame, not a crime. Criminality requires that some action be taken in force against personhood or property. Hate is not force. Hate is simply a feeling, a thought which exists only in the mind until acted upon in reality. Is a crime which is predicated upon hate any more criminal than one predicated on greed? On lust? The simple answer is no. Of course not. Crimes of hate are no more criminal than crimes of passion. It is the action which is criminal, not it's motive.
Philip Spooner at the legislative hearing-As I drove past the park last week, I saw an opponent of same-sex marriage standing stubbornly in a driving rain, desperately struggling to hammer a huge American flag into the center of a vast sea of signs saying YES On 1! – that is, drive these homosexual weirdos out in the name of God and country. I came by 20 minutes later and she was still there, soaked but fervent.
If citizens of this country ever again enjoy the blessings of liberty and true freedom, it will not be the result of a majority of its citizens having risen up in righteous indignation at governmental abuse of themselves and their culture. If a restoration of the Constitution of our forbears occurs - with all that this implies - it will probably not be because a plurality of citizens fought for it, supported it, or cared one way or another.